Four years ago, almost no one was spending real money on B2B Influencer Marketing. Today, enterprise software companies are paying creators five and six figures to post on LinkedIn, IBM is briefing data analytics creators by name, and MrBeast is doing deals with Salesforce.
The shift is happening because the buyers have changed where they look. Enterprise software purchases that used to start with a Gartner report now start with a LinkedIn post from someone the buyer trusts. Marketers have noticed, and budgets are following. But the practitioners building these programs will tell you something the agency decks won’t: B2B Influencer Marketing is not a smaller, more buttoned-up version of B2C Influencer Marketing. It is a different discipline entirely, with different economics, different platforms, and a different measure of what counts as a win. In B2B, a single like from the right CTO is worth more than ten thousand from the wrong audience. The category is growing fast, and most brands are still figuring out how to do it well.
It’s Not Influencer Marketing. It’s the New PR.
Ask the operators running B2B programs what they actually do, and very few of them describe it as Influencer Marketing. They describe it as something closer to public relations, outbound sales, and brand-building rolled into one.
“Influencer Marketing is more than just hiring an influencer to do a post. The way you have to think about Influencer Marketing is that we’re seeing it as the new PR,” says Morgan J Ingram, who leads B2B creator strategy at AMP Social.
That reframe matters because it changes how you measure success. A traditional PR placement in a trade publication doesn’t get judged on impressions or click-through rates. It gets judged on whether the right people saw it and whether it shifted how a category thinks about your company. B2B Influencer Marketing operates on the same logic.
Dani Markovits, founder of the LinkedIn-focused agency Shake Content, frames the underlying shift in plainer terms. “In B2B, with so much competition, buyers choose companies and people they feel trust and connection with, often through content or conversation. Trust has become the biggest currency driving business decisions,” he says.
That is the real product B2B Influencer Marketing sells. Not awareness. Trust.
Who Saw It Matters More Than How Many
The hardest mental adjustment for marketers coming from a B2C background is letting go of reach as the primary metric. In B2C, scale is the point. In B2B, scale is often the enemy.
“In B2B, it doesn’t matter how many users saw the content. It really matters who saw your content. The biggest thing is relevancy,” says Margo Laz, founder of Kudos Narratives. “You can have thousands of likes, but in B2B, just one like can matter from your target client.”
The economics behind that statement are the reason B2B influencer budgets are climbing. Eugene Healey, an independent B2B creator, walks through the math. “If I secure a lead that converts for one of my tech clients, that’s potentially worth $10,000 to $20,000 a year. Compare that to a B2C customer whose lifetime value might be $5,000 over their entire lifetime. B2B creators have pre-built audiences with all the trust that goes along with it.”
A creator with 18,000 followers in cybersecurity infrastructure can be more valuable to a vendor selling six-figure contracts than a lifestyle creator with two million followers. The audience is the asset, and in B2B, the asset is precision.
That is reshaping who counts as a creator in the first place. “The future B2B creators won’t be creators at all in a traditional way. Those will be people who are actually working in the industry,” Laz says. The implication: the most influential voices in enterprise tech are operators with day jobs, not full-time content people.
Aneesh Lal, who runs the B2B creator agency The Wishly Group, puts a finer point on it. “These change agents are the creators I represent. They just happen to be called influencers on LinkedIn.”
LinkedIn Is the Platform. Brands Are Still Catching Up.
LinkedIn is where B2B Influencer Marketing lives, and the platform itself has been quietly building the infrastructure to support it. Patrick Zielinski, who led LinkedIn’s initial creator engagement team and now runs The Drive Agency, says the targeting precision is the draw for enterprise advertisers. “When IBM comes to us, it’s because they’ve seen this creator talk about data analytics at a very specific level.”
But the creative playbook for LinkedIn is still being written, and most brands are writing it badly.
“The content that performs the best, the stories that lead to real impact, are the ones told by the individual, not from the logos, not from the company pages,” Markovits says. The companies struggling on LinkedIn are usually the ones still trying to push corporate content through a channel that rewards personal voice.
The fix is sitting inside the building. “Employees are the best ambassadors for a company, but many companies still don’t leverage their employees well on LinkedIn. Some even prohibit employees from speaking about company topics,” Markovits says.
The brands that lean into individual voices, both employees and external creators, are operating in a part of the platform that most competitors have not touched. “LinkedIn is criminally undervalued. A lot of people aren’t looking at that platform, but as a video creator especially, there’s a huge opportunity,” says Colin Rocker, a content creator who has built an audience there.
Even the practitioners doing this for a living acknowledge the category is immature. “B2B Influencer Marketing on LinkedIn is a space that brands are still taking time to figure out in terms of what it will look like and whether it is actually worthwhile,” Doe says.
The most common failure mode is creative timidity. “LinkedIn is very B2B focused, but brands tend to pigeonhole creators into expected content forms. It’s always ‘download this report’ or ‘sign up for our newsletter.’ There is an appetite for something more. Brands need to be more comfortable thinking outside the box about what a creative influencer campaign actually looks like,” says social strategist Jayde I. Powell.
The signal that this is moving past the experimental stage: traditional B2C giants are now showing up. “I love seeing the emergence of more B2B advertising with creators. You see MrBeast partnering with Salesforce, really unique combinations,” says Scott Sutton, CEO of Later.
Three Models That Actually Work
Across the most-cited B2B influencer programs, the same three structures show up again and again.
The first is partnerships with external thought leaders, practitioners who have built domain-specific audiences on LinkedIn over years of posting. These are people whose followers are largely buyers, builders, or operators in a specific category, and whose endorsement carries weight because it has been earned in public over time. The second is employee advocacy, where companies turn internal experts into public voices on the platforms where their buyers spend time. The third is executive personal brand building, treating the CEO or CTO as the company’s most important creator. The right answer for most brands is some combination of the three.
“I saw that the shift in the market was shifting more towards companies creating content, partnering with influencers, and creating internal influencers,” Ingram says.
The employee model is where most companies have the most untapped leverage, and the least excuse for not acting on it. The most ambitious operators are not just hiring external creators; they are building creators inside the company. “Influence is the new outbound. You need to be tapping into external influencers if you can. But also more importantly, how are you creating people internally to be those influencers?” Ingram says.
That second half is where most B2B programs underinvest. The product manager who has been answering customer questions for six years usually knows the category better than any external creator a brand could hire. Turning that person into a public voice, with the time, training, and editorial latitude to post regularly, is what the strongest employee advocacy programs do. “If your client is a B2B client, an employee advocacy program could boost those results. When employees start participating, there is an exponential growth in engagement and reach for the company,” says Ismael El-Qudsi, founder of SocialPubli.
Some operators are pushing for an even broader frame. AJ Eckstein, who founded Creator Match, the first LinkedIn-focused creator matching platform, argues the B2B and B2C distinction is itself outdated. “If you want to do anything around B2B or B2C, we’re calling it this new acronym: B2P, business to professional,” he says. The argument is that buyers are people regardless of what they’re buying, and the content that moves them works on the same emotional logic in either context.
Eckstein is also frank about how nascent the category still is. “Everybody thinks we’re crazy, that we’re focusing on a channel that historically has never had any creator or Influencer Marketing,” he says.
That gap is the opportunity. “Most people are not focusing on B2B. It is a space where people need help with that education and also how to execute,” Ingram says.
The Attribution Problem
The hardest part of B2B Influencer Marketing is not running the programs. It is proving they worked.
B2B sales cycles run six to eighteen months. Buying decisions are made by committees, not individuals. A prospect might see a creator’s LinkedIn post, sit on it for nine months, attend a webinar, get a cold email from sales, then close a deal. Attributing that revenue to the original post is genuinely difficult, and most marketing teams are not set up to do it.
“A common challenge brands raise is the inability to predict or measure exact ROI per influencer, and difficulty reporting these results back to leadership,” says Brianna Doe, founder of Verbatim.
The pressure that creates is changing how creators are allowed to work. “The increased focus on attribution and ROI in B2B is leading to less creative control for influencers, especially on LinkedIn,” Doe says. The brands most desperate to prove ROI tend to be the ones squeezing the creative formats that made the channel work in the first place.
The category is growing, but not in the way the early hype suggested. “B2B Influencer Marketing is still growing quickly but not necessarily in the way people expected, as brands are tightening their belts and requiring everything to track back to attribution and ROI,” Doe says.
Doe’s caution to her own clients is worth flagging for any marketer evaluating a B2B program: “I think a lot of B2B marketers are still figuring out how to measure it. I always caution brands against directly tying it from a lead to a conversion if the influencer has no ownership in that process.”
The operators solving the attribution problem are the ones who have stopped trying to map a single LinkedIn post to a closed deal. They measure pipeline influence instead. They look at whether the accounts that closed engaged with creator content somewhere along the journey, not whether someone clicked a UTM link. That is closer to how PR and brand marketing have always been measured, which fits the reframe Ingram and others have been pushing all along.
What Good Looks Like
The most sophisticated B2B influencer programs share a few traits. They treat the work as long-term trust infrastructure rather than campaign spend. They pick creators based on domain relevance and audience composition, not follower count. They give creators editorial freedom rather than scripts. And they measure success against pipeline and category authority, not impressions.
The companies getting this right understand a point Markovits keeps coming back to, which doubles as the closing argument for why this category exists at all.
“LinkedIn is now the most important platform for everyone. More and more companies are prioritizing it, but the content that works is told by individuals, not logos. Even in B2B, people want to connect, be entertained, be educated. Business deals are still between people.”
Nii A. Ahene is the founder and managing director of Net Influencer, a website dedicated to offering insights into the influencer marketing industry. Together with its newsletter, Influencer Weekly, Net Influencer provides news, commentary, and analysis of the events shaping the creator and influencer marketing space. Through interviews with startups, influencers, brands, and platforms, Nii and his team explore how influencer marketing is being effectively used to benefit businesses and personal brands alike.
Four years ago, almost no one was spending real money on B2B Influencer Marketing. Today, enterprise software companies are paying creators five and six figures to post on LinkedIn, IBM is briefing data analytics creators by name, and MrBeast is doing deals with Salesforce.
The shift is happening because the buyers have changed where they look. Enterprise software purchases that used to start with a Gartner report now start with a LinkedIn post from someone the buyer trusts. Marketers have noticed, and budgets are following. But the practitioners building these programs will tell you something the agency decks won’t: B2B Influencer Marketing is not a smaller, more buttoned-up version of B2C Influencer Marketing. It is a different discipline entirely, with different economics, different platforms, and a different measure of what counts as a win. In B2B, a single like from the right CTO is worth more than ten thousand from the wrong audience. The category is growing fast, and most brands are still figuring out how to do it well.
It’s Not Influencer Marketing. It’s the New PR.
Ask the operators running B2B programs what they actually do, and very few of them describe it as Influencer Marketing. They describe it as something closer to public relations, outbound sales, and brand-building rolled into one.
“Influencer Marketing is more than just hiring an influencer to do a post. The way you have to think about Influencer Marketing is that we’re seeing it as the new PR,” says Morgan J Ingram, who leads B2B creator strategy at AMP Social.
That reframe matters because it changes how you measure success. A traditional PR placement in a trade publication doesn’t get judged on impressions or click-through rates. It gets judged on whether the right people saw it and whether it shifted how a category thinks about your company. B2B Influencer Marketing operates on the same logic.
Dani Markovits, founder of the LinkedIn-focused agency Shake Content, frames the underlying shift in plainer terms. “In B2B, with so much competition, buyers choose companies and people they feel trust and connection with, often through content or conversation. Trust has become the biggest currency driving business decisions,” he says.
That is the real product B2B Influencer Marketing sells. Not awareness. Trust.
Who Saw It Matters More Than How Many
The hardest mental adjustment for marketers coming from a B2C background is letting go of reach as the primary metric. In B2C, scale is the point. In B2B, scale is often the enemy.
“In B2B, it doesn’t matter how many users saw the content. It really matters who saw your content. The biggest thing is relevancy,” says Margo Laz, founder of Kudos Narratives. “You can have thousands of likes, but in B2B, just one like can matter from your target client.”
The economics behind that statement are the reason B2B influencer budgets are climbing. Eugene Healey, an independent B2B creator, walks through the math. “If I secure a lead that converts for one of my tech clients, that’s potentially worth $10,000 to $20,000 a year. Compare that to a B2C customer whose lifetime value might be $5,000 over their entire lifetime. B2B creators have pre-built audiences with all the trust that goes along with it.”
A creator with 18,000 followers in cybersecurity infrastructure can be more valuable to a vendor selling six-figure contracts than a lifestyle creator with two million followers. The audience is the asset, and in B2B, the asset is precision.
That is reshaping who counts as a creator in the first place. “The future B2B creators won’t be creators at all in a traditional way. Those will be people who are actually working in the industry,” Laz says. The implication: the most influential voices in enterprise tech are operators with day jobs, not full-time content people.
Aneesh Lal, who runs the B2B creator agency The Wishly Group, puts a finer point on it. “These change agents are the creators I represent. They just happen to be called influencers on LinkedIn.”
LinkedIn Is the Platform. Brands Are Still Catching Up.
LinkedIn is where B2B Influencer Marketing lives, and the platform itself has been quietly building the infrastructure to support it. Patrick Zielinski, who led LinkedIn’s initial creator engagement team and now runs The Drive Agency, says the targeting precision is the draw for enterprise advertisers. “When IBM comes to us, it’s because they’ve seen this creator talk about data analytics at a very specific level.”
But the creative playbook for LinkedIn is still being written, and most brands are writing it badly.
“The content that performs the best, the stories that lead to real impact, are the ones told by the individual, not from the logos, not from the company pages,” Markovits says. The companies struggling on LinkedIn are usually the ones still trying to push corporate content through a channel that rewards personal voice.
The fix is sitting inside the building. “Employees are the best ambassadors for a company, but many companies still don’t leverage their employees well on LinkedIn. Some even prohibit employees from speaking about company topics,” Markovits says.
The brands that lean into individual voices, both employees and external creators, are operating in a part of the platform that most competitors have not touched. “LinkedIn is criminally undervalued. A lot of people aren’t looking at that platform, but as a video creator especially, there’s a huge opportunity,” says Colin Rocker, a content creator who has built an audience there.
Even the practitioners doing this for a living acknowledge the category is immature. “B2B Influencer Marketing on LinkedIn is a space that brands are still taking time to figure out in terms of what it will look like and whether it is actually worthwhile,” Doe says.
The most common failure mode is creative timidity. “LinkedIn is very B2B focused, but brands tend to pigeonhole creators into expected content forms. It’s always ‘download this report’ or ‘sign up for our newsletter.’ There is an appetite for something more. Brands need to be more comfortable thinking outside the box about what a creative influencer campaign actually looks like,” says social strategist Jayde I. Powell.
The signal that this is moving past the experimental stage: traditional B2C giants are now showing up. “I love seeing the emergence of more B2B advertising with creators. You see MrBeast partnering with Salesforce, really unique combinations,” says Scott Sutton, CEO of Later.
Three Models That Actually Work
Across the most-cited B2B influencer programs, the same three structures show up again and again.
The first is partnerships with external thought leaders, practitioners who have built domain-specific audiences on LinkedIn over years of posting. These are people whose followers are largely buyers, builders, or operators in a specific category, and whose endorsement carries weight because it has been earned in public over time. The second is employee advocacy, where companies turn internal experts into public voices on the platforms where their buyers spend time. The third is executive personal brand building, treating the CEO or CTO as the company’s most important creator. The right answer for most brands is some combination of the three.
“I saw that the shift in the market was shifting more towards companies creating content, partnering with influencers, and creating internal influencers,” Ingram says.
The employee model is where most companies have the most untapped leverage, and the least excuse for not acting on it. The most ambitious operators are not just hiring external creators; they are building creators inside the company. “Influence is the new outbound. You need to be tapping into external influencers if you can. But also more importantly, how are you creating people internally to be those influencers?” Ingram says.
That second half is where most B2B programs underinvest. The product manager who has been answering customer questions for six years usually knows the category better than any external creator a brand could hire. Turning that person into a public voice, with the time, training, and editorial latitude to post regularly, is what the strongest employee advocacy programs do. “If your client is a B2B client, an employee advocacy program could boost those results. When employees start participating, there is an exponential growth in engagement and reach for the company,” says Ismael El-Qudsi, founder of SocialPubli.
Some operators are pushing for an even broader frame. AJ Eckstein, who founded Creator Match, the first LinkedIn-focused creator matching platform, argues the B2B and B2C distinction is itself outdated. “If you want to do anything around B2B or B2C, we’re calling it this new acronym: B2P, business to professional,” he says. The argument is that buyers are people regardless of what they’re buying, and the content that moves them works on the same emotional logic in either context.
Eckstein is also frank about how nascent the category still is. “Everybody thinks we’re crazy, that we’re focusing on a channel that historically has never had any creator or Influencer Marketing,” he says.
That gap is the opportunity. “Most people are not focusing on B2B. It is a space where people need help with that education and also how to execute,” Ingram says.
The Attribution Problem
The hardest part of B2B Influencer Marketing is not running the programs. It is proving they worked.
B2B sales cycles run six to eighteen months. Buying decisions are made by committees, not individuals. A prospect might see a creator’s LinkedIn post, sit on it for nine months, attend a webinar, get a cold email from sales, then close a deal. Attributing that revenue to the original post is genuinely difficult, and most marketing teams are not set up to do it.
“A common challenge brands raise is the inability to predict or measure exact ROI per influencer, and difficulty reporting these results back to leadership,” says Brianna Doe, founder of Verbatim.
The pressure that creates is changing how creators are allowed to work. “The increased focus on attribution and ROI in B2B is leading to less creative control for influencers, especially on LinkedIn,” Doe says. The brands most desperate to prove ROI tend to be the ones squeezing the creative formats that made the channel work in the first place.
The category is growing, but not in the way the early hype suggested. “B2B Influencer Marketing is still growing quickly but not necessarily in the way people expected, as brands are tightening their belts and requiring everything to track back to attribution and ROI,” Doe says.
Doe’s caution to her own clients is worth flagging for any marketer evaluating a B2B program: “I think a lot of B2B marketers are still figuring out how to measure it. I always caution brands against directly tying it from a lead to a conversion if the influencer has no ownership in that process.”
The operators solving the attribution problem are the ones who have stopped trying to map a single LinkedIn post to a closed deal. They measure pipeline influence instead. They look at whether the accounts that closed engaged with creator content somewhere along the journey, not whether someone clicked a UTM link. That is closer to how PR and brand marketing have always been measured, which fits the reframe Ingram and others have been pushing all along.
What Good Looks Like
The most sophisticated B2B influencer programs share a few traits. They treat the work as long-term trust infrastructure rather than campaign spend. They pick creators based on domain relevance and audience composition, not follower count. They give creators editorial freedom rather than scripts. And they measure success against pipeline and category authority, not impressions.
The companies getting this right understand a point Markovits keeps coming back to, which doubles as the closing argument for why this category exists at all.
“LinkedIn is now the most important platform for everyone. More and more companies are prioritizing it, but the content that works is told by individuals, not logos. Even in B2B, people want to connect, be entertained, be educated. Business deals are still between people.”
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Check Out Our Podcast