The United States government submitted a formal response on June 5 to the UK’s ongoing consultation on child online safety, opposing proposed social media bans for users under 16 and calling for parental controls as the primary regulatory approach instead of platform-level restrictions.
The notice, published by the U.S. Embassy in London in response to the consultation launched on March 2, 2026, reflects the Trump administration’s position that government-mandated bans risk imposing “disproportionate” compliance burdens on American technology companies. The submission called on UK regulators to empower parents with tools to manage their children’s digital experiences.
Parental Tools Over Platform Restrictions
The U.S. government argued that parents should serve as “the first and best line of defense” and that platform-level controls allow for customization based on individual children’s needs and maturity levels. The submission called on platforms to offer optional tools, including screen time limits, usage throttling, and curfews that parents can enable voluntarily.
The notice also raised technical concerns about age assurance for the 13-to-16 age range, stating that “technical methods developed to distinguish minors from adults cannot simply be repurposed for younger thresholds,” and identified parental attestation as the most practical path forward for that group.
For broader age verification, the U.S. government expressed support for Zero Knowledge Proof technology, which allows for binary yes/no age confirmation without retaining or sharing personal data. The submission opposed measures that would compel platforms to collect government-issued identification such as driver’s licenses or passports, citing privacy and security risks.
UK and International Context
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to announce restrictions on “harmful” social media apps next week, with potential exemptions for educational platforms, according to The Guardian. A UK government spokesperson said the government is “determined to act quickly, but will do so in a way that is effective, enforceable and genuinely keeps children safe.”
The U.S. submission arrives as the regulatory debate over child access to social platforms expands internationally. Australia introduced a blanket ban on social media use for users under 16, covering major platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat. Major platforms restricted approximately 4.7 million accounts identified as belonging to under-16 users in the first half of December, following the law’s December 10 implementation, according to Australia’s eSafety Commission.
The U.S. notice also flagged concerns that UK and EU regulations disproportionately target American technology companies. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is currently seeking a judicial review of fees and fines provisions under the UK’s Online Safety Act.
Dragomir is a Serbian freelance blog writer and translator. He is passionate about covering insightful stories and exploring topics such as influencer marketing, the creator economy, technology, business, and cyber fraud.
The United States government submitted a formal response on June 5 to the UK’s ongoing consultation on child online safety, opposing proposed social media bans for users under 16 and calling for parental controls as the primary regulatory approach instead of platform-level restrictions.
The notice, published by the U.S. Embassy in London in response to the consultation launched on March 2, 2026, reflects the Trump administration’s position that government-mandated bans risk imposing “disproportionate” compliance burdens on American technology companies. The submission called on UK regulators to empower parents with tools to manage their children’s digital experiences.
Parental Tools Over Platform Restrictions
The U.S. government argued that parents should serve as “the first and best line of defense” and that platform-level controls allow for customization based on individual children’s needs and maturity levels. The submission called on platforms to offer optional tools, including screen time limits, usage throttling, and curfews that parents can enable voluntarily.
The notice also raised technical concerns about age assurance for the 13-to-16 age range, stating that “technical methods developed to distinguish minors from adults cannot simply be repurposed for younger thresholds,” and identified parental attestation as the most practical path forward for that group.
For broader age verification, the U.S. government expressed support for Zero Knowledge Proof technology, which allows for binary yes/no age confirmation without retaining or sharing personal data. The submission opposed measures that would compel platforms to collect government-issued identification such as driver’s licenses or passports, citing privacy and security risks.
UK and International Context
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to announce restrictions on “harmful” social media apps next week, with potential exemptions for educational platforms, according to The Guardian. A UK government spokesperson said the government is “determined to act quickly, but will do so in a way that is effective, enforceable and genuinely keeps children safe.”
The U.S. submission arrives as the regulatory debate over child access to social platforms expands internationally. Australia introduced a blanket ban on social media use for users under 16, covering major platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat. Major platforms restricted approximately 4.7 million accounts identified as belonging to under-16 users in the first half of December, following the law’s December 10 implementation, according to Australia’s eSafety Commission.
The U.S. notice also flagged concerns that UK and EU regulations disproportionately target American technology companies. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is currently seeking a judicial review of fees and fines provisions under the UK’s Online Safety Act.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Check Out Our Podcast