Most creator-owned product lines don’t fail at launch. They fail in the weeks that follow, when the founder returns to affiliate links and brand partnerships, according to Gary John, founder and CEO of GIG Companies, who has watched this pattern play out since 2019 from a vantage point most people in the Creator Economy don’t occupy: the supply chain.

GIG, founded in 2019 and based in Florida, was built as a full-service venture-building firm for creators and talent. The premise: creators had audiences and influence, but no single integrated team could take them from concept to market and beyond. “They don’t want to work with 10 or 15 different vendors or contractors or freelancers,” Gary says. “They need one source that’s premium, high-touch, full-service, white-glove.” 

GIG’s in-house capabilities span due diligence and validation, ideation, product development, supply chain and manufacturing, creative and brand development, go-to-market strategy, and ongoing operations.

Gary’s background is not in content or talent management. He spent more than a decade in brands and manufacturing, leading businesses across various industries and product categories before his time in the vape industry introduced him to Influencer Marketing from the outside. He noticed that the creators driving the most effective customer acquisition collected flat fees and owned nothing for the long term. He exited that business, assembled what he describes as a turnkey set of integrated capabilities, and started GIG to give creators a path from partnership revenue to business ownership.

Treating Every Day Like Launch Day

The failure mode Gary describes most often isn’t a bad product. It’s a creator who reverts to creator behavior the moment the launch announcement is made. “They have a hard time acting like a founder,” Gary says.

The pattern, he argues, reflects a confusion between running a creative career and running a company. “The difference between success and failure is a mindset, and it is a daily protocol,” Gary says. “Where you treat every day like launch day.” The creators behind the large-revenue stories, he adds, are the ones who sustain the energy and operational discipline of a product company over time, not just at launch.

The second path Gary identifies is the creator who recognizes they shouldn’t be managing operations at all. Stepping aside and assembling a strong operating team is, in his view, where the biggest creator brand businesses get built. “They have a great operating team, and the creator steps aside,” he says. The distinction between a creator who wants to own a business and one who wants to run a business is, for Gary, a critical filter at the outset.

Product Is One Item on a Very Long List

Gary sees product development as only one component of what getting a consumer brand to market actually requires. “If you really sat down and made a list of what goes into launching a successful product line, product’s only one thing,” he says. “There’s a hundred other things on that list.”

He names brand naming, packaging, unit economics, manufacturing negotiations, supplier vetting, logistics, and import planning as factors between a creator’s vision and a viable business. 

For creators, Gary notes, the problem is compounded by limited experience managing multiple vendors simultaneously. Engaging a product developer, a branding firm, a web developer, and a supply chain consultant separately means managing timelines and dependencies across all of them, without the operational background to do it efficiently. GIG’s case is that integrating those capabilities in-house removes the coordination burden entirely.

The Ownership Model Creators Come For

GIG’s primary engagement model is structured around what Gary calls a wholly owned business venture. The creator carries the financial risk, including development costs and the first inventory purchase order, and in exchange retains full ownership of all intellectual property: formulations, ingredient lists, patterns, and brand assets. GIG charges a development fee for the build. 

“At the end of the process, it’s their business,” Gary says. “They own the intellectual property, they own the formulations.”

The structure was designed in direct response to what Gary observed early in his career: creators wanted to own businesses outright, not enter into revenue share arrangements or give up equity. A talent agent he met through the vape industry had a roster of clients who wanted businesses of their own but could not find anyone to build them on a wholly owned basis. That conversation became GIG’s founding logic.

A secondary model exists for a short list of opportunities Gary identifies as having potential for scale. In those cases, GIG will enter a joint venture and share risk. He describes the bar as high and the list as short, distinct from the development-fee model that forms the core of the business.

Due Diligence Before Development Is the Competitive Argument

Before development begins, GIG runs a validation phase that includes market research, category analysis, supply chain assessment, and financial modeling, with particular attention to unit economics: the spread between manufacturing cost and retail price, margin viability, and projected operating expenses. “I feel like I spend most of my weeks actually telling creators no,” Gary says.

The validation is important because, according to Gary, many creator product lines are built for a strong launch and a weak business. A product can generate attention at launch and still fail financially if the margin structure doesn’t support operating costs or if the category doesn’t sustain repeat purchase. “If you launch a product that’s not profitable, then it’s just an expensive hobby,” Gary says. “We’re really good about engineering the financial roadmap and then we build the beautiful product on top of that.”

Research also draws on creators’ existing data, including brand collaboration performance, affiliate sales history, and audience demographics, to identify which categories and price points are most likely to convert. Gary frames this as quantifying the audience relationship before committing capital to development, and it informs the category recommendations GIG delivers before any product work begins.

Creator IP Is Becoming an Expectation. The Infrastructure Isn’t Ready.

Gary draws a direct parallel between the current moment in creator IP and what happened when affiliate marketing became a dominant revenue stream in the Creator Economy. He explains that management companies at the time found themselves scrambling to develop internal expertise, because talent was generating affiliate income without management involvement. “All of the management companies had to figure out how to become affiliate marketing experts overnight,” Gary says.

He expects the same dynamic to play out around creator IP, as creators increasingly expect their managers and management companies to help them evaluate and execute product ventures. “We’re entering into what I would call an arms race,” Gary says, describing how the leadership of major agencies and management companies is working to build creator IP capability across their rosters.

The learning curve, he argues, is steep. Doing it in an integrated way requires capabilities most representation firms don’t currently have, and the demand is arriving at the same time across a large number of rosters.

The IP Conversation Has Arrived. The Infrastructure Hasn’t.

Gary believes creator IP will become a standard expectation across the industry, but with important caveats. Not every creator is positioned for a product venture, and not every category is the right fit. The conversation, in his view, is outpacing the infrastructure available to support it responsibly.

“Everyone is racing to figure out how to get their hands on turnkey capabilities and infrastructure,” Gary says. “Product’s important, but you never get to the product and beyond if you don’t have a turnkey way of going about it.” GIG’s long-term bet is that repeatable, integrated infrastructure, not product design or brand identity alone, is what will determine which creator ventures sustain beyond the first product cycle.

“It will become an expectation,” Gary says of creator IP in the industry. “How people determine what their IP actually is and who should participate, I think that’s going to look very different creator by creator.”

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Check Out Our Podcast